Re: Porting PostgreSQL to DragonFly BSD

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Rumko <rumcic(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Porting PostgreSQL to DragonFly BSD
Date: 2011-03-01 21:44:16
Message-ID: 1299015856.30816.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tis, 2011-03-01 at 22:22 +0100, Rumko wrote:
> Well, wouldn't consider it ugly, but the patch (attached and available at
> http://www.rumko.net/0001-DragonFly-BSD-support-linked.patch ) is a lot
> shorter.
>
> Uses freebsd's template and defines the linker in Makefile.shlib.

The piece in Makefile.shlib you add is dead code because PORTNAME will
never be "dragonfly" (it would be "freebsd"). I see there is a
difference between the existing freebsd code and what you propose to add
in that freebsd doesn't use shared object minor versions. Is that also
or not the case on DragonFly BSD?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-03-01 21:51:58 toast tables on system catalogs
Previous Message Maxim Boguk 2011-03-01 21:44:11 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set happend during repeatable vacuum