| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, AndreasKarlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, DimitriFontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug in pg_describe_object |
| Date: | 2011-01-11 15:16:35 |
| Message-ID: | 1294758917-sup-3430@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mar ene 11 10:52:12 -0300 2011:
> Well, we shouldn't change them randomly or arbitrarily, but improving them is another thing altogether. I think the contention that any user or application anywhere is depending on the exact textual representation of a pg_amproc entry is exceedingly dubious. And I think the current messages are flat-out confusing.
Tom also mentioned that the descriptions are translated, so an
application built to parse anything out of the strings is already
broken.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joel Jacobson | 2011-01-11 15:31:32 | Re: Bug in pg_describe_object |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-11 15:12:03 | Re: Bug in pg_describe_object |