Re: v10 pg_ctl compatibility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: v10 pg_ctl compatibility
Date: 2017-09-26 20:10:01
Message-ID: 12919.1506456601@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> To add insult to injury, when v10 pg_ctl does restart a pre-10 server and
> it sits there for a long time waiting for it to start up even though it has
> already started up, if I hit ctrl-C because I assume something is horribly
> wrong, it then goes ahead and kills the successfully started-and-running
> server.

Really? The server should have detached itself from your terminal
group long before that. What platform is this?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maksim Milyutin 2017-09-26 20:25:07 Re: [BUG] Cache invalidation for queries that contains const of temporary composite type
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-09-26 20:07:02 Re: [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?