Re: dblink versus long connection strings

From: queej <dqj(at)authentrics(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dblink versus long connection strings
Date: 2010-11-29 16:01:59
Message-ID: 1291046519378-3284620.post@n5.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I have views that use the dblink(connStr text, sql text) call. They cannot
use a two-step process. So postgres 9.0 has broken all of those views. Is
there a straightforward solution to this?
--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/dblink-versus-long-connection-strings-tp3275575p3284620.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-29 16:06:04 Re: directory archive format for pg_dump
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-29 15:52:44 Re: Report: Linux huge pages with Postgres