Re: unlogged tables

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unlogged tables
Date: 2010-11-17 19:32:22
Message-ID: 1290021671-sup-7956@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié nov 17 15:48:56 -0300 2010:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> > Robert, All:
> >
> > I hope you're following the thread on -general about this feature.
> > We're getting a lot of feedback.
>
> I haven't been; I'm not subscribed to general; it'd be useful to CC me
> next time.

FWIW I've figured that being subscribed to the lists is good even if I
have my mail client configured to hide these emails by default. It's a
lot easier for searching stuff that someone else references.

(I made the mistake of having it hide all pg-general email even though I
was CC'ed, though, which is the trivial way to implement this. I don't
recommend repeating this mistake.)

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-17 19:37:30 Re: unlogged tables
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-11-17 19:31:26 Re: unlogged tables