Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Date: 2010-11-13 20:13:17
Message-ID: 1289679197.13321.11.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On lör, 2010-11-13 at 20:07 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2010-11-13 at 12:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > On lör, 2010-11-13 at 11:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It looks like all the unhappy critters are getting the same "virtual
> > >> memory exhausted" error. I wonder whether they are all using make
> > >> 3.80 ...
> >
> > > It turns out that there is an unrelated bug in 3.80 that some Linux
> > > distributions have patched around. 3.81 or 3.82 are OK.
> >
> > So what do you mean by "unrelated bug"? Can we work around it?
>
> The information is fuzzy, but the problem has been reported around the
> internet, and it appears to be related to the foreach function. I think
> I have an idea how to work around it, but I'll need some time.

Well, it looks like $(eval) is pretty broken in 3.80, so either we
require 3.81 or we abandon this line of thought.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-13 21:48:10 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-11-13 18:07:42 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improved parallel make support

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-11-13 20:15:40 SSI update
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-11-13 19:12:55 Re: wCTE behaviour