Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-29 18:01:41
Message-ID: 12887.1217354501@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> Damn, I was away from mail yesterday; sorry. I have some revisions,  
> mostly improving casting compatibility with text.

Huh?  What's to improve?

I know that you're still fooling with the regexp functions, but I
figured that could be added later.

> Tom, have you committed anything yet?

No, but I've put a couple of hours into editorialization and don't
want to throw that away.  How about you wait for my commit and then
send a patch revising whatever you want to?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2008-07-29 18:03:32
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2008-07-29 17:23:47
Subject: Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group