Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David E(dot) Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date: 2010-10-21 04:58:26
Message-ID: 1287637049-sup-3453@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Itagaki Takahiro's message of jue oct 21 00:01:59 -0300 2010:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:14 AM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> > Might I suggest instead a META.json file like PGXN requires?
>
> I think JSON is also reasonable, but one of the problem to use JSON format is
> we cannot apply the extension patch until JSON patch has been applied ;-)

What's wrong with sticking to Makefile syntax? Are we intending to
build a JSON parser in GNU make perchance?

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-10-21 05:02:39 UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-21 04:54:26 Re: pg_hba.conf host name wildcard support