Re: ISN patch that applies cleanly with git apply

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Otto <asche(at)me(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ISN patch that applies cleanly with git apply
Date: 2010-10-20 13:02:56
Message-ID: 1287579776.29990.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On ons, 2010-10-20 at 11:12 +0100, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Can I take it that there is no need for a formal review, where I
> answer various questions per
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch?

The short answer is no. But note that there is no such thing as a
"formal" review. The page you link to is only a guideline if you set
out to review something and don't know what to do.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-20 13:29:04 Re: max_wal_senders must die
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-20 13:02:36 Re: Extensions, this time with a patch