Re: ALTER DATABASE RENAME with HS/SR

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER DATABASE RENAME with HS/SR
Date: 2010-10-05 08:11:34
Message-ID: 1286266294.2025.887.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:29 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > OTOH, we don't have a similar interlock to prevent renaming users
> > who have active sessions, so maybe we are being overprotective here.
>
> Yep. What is worse is that we can drop users who have active sessions
> on the standby. Then we can get the following error from those sessions:
>
> => SELECT current_user;
> ERROR: invalid role OID: 16384

Hot Standby faithfully implements the current behaviour on the master in
that case.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-10-05 08:17:14 Re: ALTER DATABASE RENAME with HS/SR
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-10-05 08:06:50 Re: OUTER keyword