Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms
Date: 2010-09-22 21:02:18
Message-ID: 1285189338.25937.97.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 13:58 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 04:28:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > > We can start by supporting only platforms git runs on, this being
> > > the first in what I'd picture as a set of base requirements.
> >
> > Sounds like allowing the tail to wag the dog.
>
> "Runs git" is actually not a bad proxy for "has modern developer
> tools."
>
> This would be the first, as I mentioned, of a list of base functional
> requirements.

David,

Perhaps you could suggest some more specific ideas of your proposal? I
mean I am with you on the idea of reducing our supported platforms. I
see no reason to support

<Solaris 9
<NetBSD in any form
<FreeBSD <6
<Any Linux not supported by its own community (e.g; FC9)
<Irix
<> SCO

Note: I am not actually advocating this as much as stating my own
personal opinion.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-09-22 21:08:42 Re: Another Modest Proposal: Platforms
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2010-09-22 21:01:47 Why is time with timezone 12 bytes?