Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples
Date: 2009-06-08 14:34:45
Message-ID: 12836.1244471685@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Robert Haas escribi:
>> Maybe we should just have a GUC to enable/disable
>> partial vacuums.

> IIRC you can set vacuum_freeze_table_age to 0.

That has the same effects as issuing VACUUM FREEZE, no?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-06-08 14:40:10 Re: Partial vacuum versus pg_class.reltuples
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-06-08 14:33:09 Re: pg_migrator issue with contrib