| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, gabrielle <gorthx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Explicit psqlrc |
| Date: | 2010-07-21 17:31:07 |
| Message-ID: | 1279733389-sup-540@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of mié jul 21 10:24:26 -0400 2010:
> On tis, 2010-07-20 at 11:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > It's tempting to propose making .psqlrc apply only in interactive
> > mode, period. But that would be an incompatibility with previous
> > releases, and I'm not sure it's the behavior we want, either.
>
> What is a use case for having .psqlrc be read in noninteractive use?
Even if there weren't one, why does it get applied to -f but not -c?
They're both noninteractive.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-07-21 17:48:01 | Re: patch: to_string, to_array functions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-21 17:25:05 | Re: dynamically allocating chunks from shared memory |