From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Date: | 2010-07-03 02:09:25 |
Message-ID: | 1278122965.25901.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On fre, 2010-07-02 at 19:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Is it at all practical to ship the PNGs as well as the DIA files in
> CVS, and make rebuilding the PNGs from the DIAs a separate step?
Well, that's what we're arguing about here.
> Also, I think we need to review these images carefully before adding
> any of them into our docs.
That's another matter. I'm not convinced that all of the images are
useful.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-07-03 02:13:21 | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-07-03 02:08:25 | Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams |