Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Date: 2010-07-03 02:09:25
Message-ID: 1278122965.25901.10.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On fre, 2010-07-02 at 19:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Is it at all practical to ship the PNGs as well as the DIA files in
> CVS, and make rebuilding the PNGs from the DIAs a separate step?

Well, that's what we're arguing about here.

> Also, I think we need to review these images carefully before adding
> any of them into our docs.

That's another matter. I'm not convinced that all of the images are
useful.

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-07-03 02:13:21 Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-07-03 02:08:25 Re: Documentation and explanatory diagrams