Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, alvherre <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Date: 2010-05-27 07:49:35
Message-ID: 1274946575.6152.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2010-05-27 at 04:06 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 27/05/10 03:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Being compatible with the SQL
> > standard and with Oracle is not to be taken lightly.
>
> I seem to be alone believing that the SQL standard doesn't say anything
> about named function parameters. Can someone point me to the relevant
> section of the standard?

It will be in SQL:2011.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-05-27 07:51:35 Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-05-27 07:40:31 Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature