Re: Snapshot Materialized Views - GSoC

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel <baros(dot)p(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Snapshot Materialized Views - GSoC
Date: 2010-05-26 09:57:40
Message-ID: 1274867860.4843.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On fre, 2010-05-21 at 16:31 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> I guess the justification is that with the same argument you could
> argue that a view should have relkind 'r', since it's just an empty
> table with a rewrite rule attached.

It used to be that way, but now a view doesn't have an empty table
attached to it, but no table at all. Hence the different relkind.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-05-26 10:01:43 Re: Regression testing for psql
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-05-26 09:52:10 Re: Synchronization levels in SR