From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) |
Date: | 2010-05-17 07:13:59 |
Message-ID: | 1274080439.28911.80.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 21:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I have what I believe is
> an equivalent but simpler implementation, which is attached.
There's no code comments to explain this, so without in-depth analysis
of the problem, Masao's patch and this one its not possible to say
anything.
Please explain in detail why its the right approach and put that in a
comment, so we'll understand now and in the future.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-05-17 07:38:04 | Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful) |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-17 07:07:04 | Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay |