Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Date: 2010-05-17 07:13:59
Message-ID: 1274080439.28911.80.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2010-05-16 at 21:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:

> I have what I believe is
> an equivalent but simpler implementation, which is attached.

There's no code comments to explain this, so without in-depth analysis
of the problem, Masao's patch and this one its not possible to say
anything.

Please explain in detail why its the right approach and put that in a
comment, so we'll understand now and in the future.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-05-17 07:38:04 Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-05-17 07:07:04 Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay