| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade code questions |
| Date: | 2010-05-14 05:42:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1273815758.2247.0.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-05-13 at 17:19 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I say remove it. On all accounts.
>
> There's a fork of postgres for EDB AS, shouldn't there be a fork of
> pg_upgrade the same way, if it requires special code? The code in
> community postgresql certainly shouldn't have any EDB AS code in it.
Agreed.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-05-14 06:46:09 | Re: pg_upgrade code questions |
| Previous Message | Anssi Kääriäinen | 2010-05-14 05:41:50 | Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle |