Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Date: 2013-11-22 00:40:25
Message-ID: 12738.1385080825@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've committed this patch after some significant editorialization, but
leaving the use of TABLE( ... ) syntax in-place. If we decide that we
don't want to risk doing that, we can change to some other syntax later.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru Hanada 2013-11-22 00:41:13 Re: Status of FDW pushdowns
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2013-11-21 23:20:35 Re: WIP patch for updatable security barrier views