From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tags missing from GIT mirror? |
Date: | 2010-05-13 11:46:08 |
Message-ID: | 1273751168.32172.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On tor, 2010-05-13 at 04:41 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Right, and omitting tags was in fact one of the "features" of fromcvs
> > that made us use it, because any tool that tries to convert tags will
> > explode on our CVS tree, for reasons explained in the above paragraph.
> >
> > We have also discussed this in more detail about three times before.
>
> Well, yes, but I have been wondering if this has to be an all or nothing
> deal. How many tags can we not tie to a known tree in git? My suspicion
> is we can probably identify most of them quite well. If we can that
> would be nice.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00036.php
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Moran | 2010-05-13 12:49:27 | Re: Retiring from the PostgreSQL core team |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-13 11:40:39 | Re: weird hang while running in HS mode |