Re: Tags missing from GIT mirror?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tags missing from GIT mirror?
Date: 2010-05-13 11:46:08
Message-ID: 1273751168.32172.8.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On tor, 2010-05-13 at 04:41 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Right, and omitting tags was in fact one of the "features" of fromcvs
> > that made us use it, because any tool that tries to convert tags will
> > explode on our CVS tree, for reasons explained in the above paragraph.
> >
> > We have also discussed this in more detail about three times before.
>
> Well, yes, but I have been wondering if this has to be an all or nothing
> deal. How many tags can we not tie to a known tree in git? My suspicion
> is we can probably identify most of them quite well. If we can that
> would be nice.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00036.php

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2010-05-13 12:49:27 Re: Retiring from the PostgreSQL core team
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-05-13 11:40:39 Re: weird hang while running in HS mode