| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: recovery_connections cannot start |
| Date: | 2010-04-27 13:20:53 |
| Message-ID: | 1272374453.4161.7232.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 15:10 +0200, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Treating the string "true" as a special case seems like a kludge to
> > me. Maybe a robust set of internal commands wouldn't be a kludge, but
> > that's not what's being proposed here. I guess it's just a matter of
> > opinion.
>
> I don't see how to have internal commands without having special cases
> for the setting, and I did propose "pg_archive_bypass" as the name. I
> guess the implementation would be what Simon was talking about, though.
>
> I don't see "true" as meaningful in the context of an archive_command…
Saying "its a kludge" doesn't really address the issue and goes nowhere
towards fixing it. If we don't like the proposal, fine, then what is the
alternative solution?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-27 13:30:14 | Differential backup |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-04-27 13:10:44 | Re: recovery_connections cannot start |