Re: pl/java status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Damian Carey <jamianb(at)gmail(dot)com>, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/java status
Date: 2010-04-15 16:39:26
Message-ID: 1271349566.21263.31.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 22:53 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Damian Carey wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Mostly, I think you will find that the back end developers aren't fond
> > >> of Java and thus, it doesn't get much love.
> > >>
> > >> There is a reason that plPerl is king in this community (and I don't
> > >> even like Perl).
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > Java2perl anyone ?
> > http://search.cpan.org/~philcrow/Java-Javap-0.04/bin/java2perl6
> > (99% joking)
> >
> > And if you think positively a 14hour TZ difference is really only 10
> > if you go the other way.
>
> Is PL/J still being developed? I can't find it myself, but was curious.

Not as far as I know.

>
> --
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
> EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
>

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2010-04-15 16:59:35 solaris tarballs and pl/java
Previous Message Lewis Kapell 2010-04-15 14:37:27 Re: Query is stuck