Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes
Date: 2010-03-22 14:40:04
Message-ID: 1269268804.3481.1.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2010-03-22 at 13:15 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> * inet datatypes don't have a commutative operator on which a unique
> index can be built. There is no "overlaps" equivalent, which again is a
> shame because that stops them being used with the new feature.

http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ip4r/ provides an overlap operator.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-03-22 14:46:46 Re: 9.0 release notes done
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-22 14:37:39 Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes