On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 23:39 +0900, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
> Dear Folks;
> 
> A very serious bug was reported on pg_lesslog.   So far, I found it's
> a bug in pg_compresslog.   Please do not use pg_compresslog and
> pg_decompresslog until improved version is uploaded.
> 
> I strongly advise to take base backup of your database.
> 
> I apologize for inconvenience.   I'll upload the new version ASAP.

Should this go out on announce?

> 
> Warmest Regards;
> 
> ----------
> Koichi Suzuki
> 


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.

In response to

• Bug on pg_lesslog at 2010-02-11 14:39:13 from Koichi Suzuki

Responses

• Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog at 2010-02-11 17:38:42 from Karl Denninger

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Marko Tiikkaja	Date: 2010-02-11 17:28:28
	Subject: Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations
Previous:	From: Kris Jurka	Date: 2010-02-11 17:23:03
	Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:	From: Karl Denninger	Date: 2010-02-11 17:38:42
	Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Bug on pg_lesslog
Previous:	From: Eric Pailleau	Date: 2010-02-11 16:39:50
	Subject: Re: BUG #5322: Time to perform vacuums

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Ben Chobot	Date: 2010-02-11 17:26:17
	Subject: Re: questions about a table's row estimates
Previous:	From: Andreas Kretschmer	Date: 2010-02-11 17:24:33
	Subject: Re: Postgres Triggers issue