Re: PostgreSQL licence

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL licence
Date: 2010-02-02 13:26:02
Message-ID: 1265117162.1937.30.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 13:09 +0000, Thom Brown wrote:
>
> Could someone clarify, is this guy indeed correct and the licence page
> needs updating stating it's something similar to an MIT licence, or is
> he just plain wrong? As it stands, the Wikipedia page on PostgreSQL
> says "similar to the MIT License".

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1256509037.7432.10.camel@hp-laptop2.gunduz.org

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ, RHCE
Command Prompt - http://www.CommandPrompt.com
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aaron 2010-02-02 13:51:42 Connect RDF to PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Alban Hertroys 2010-02-02 13:12:43 Re: Is this the warning message I should pay attention on it, during table partition