Re: default_language

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: default_language
Date: 2010-01-25 07:20:01
Message-ID: 1264404001.10169.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On mån, 2010-01-25 at 08:09 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/1/25 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>:
> > On sön, 2010-01-24 at 20:32 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> Why do we have a parameter called "default_do_language" when we don't
> >> have a parameter called "default_language"?
> >
> > According to the SQL standard, the default language for CREATE FUNCTION
> > is SQL. Should we implement that?
> >
>
> isn't it SQL/PSM ?

No, but if you implement the SQL/PSM part, then those statements become
part of the "SQL" language.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2010-01-25 07:40:37 Re: default_language
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-01-25 07:09:52 Re: default_language