Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: parallel regression test output

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: parallel regression test output
Date: 2010-01-18 21:54:18
Message-ID: 1263851658.24310.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2010-01-17 at 23:54 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I always assumed that it was printing the names as the tests finished,
> probably because of the way the output is staggered.  If they were
> printed when the tests were started, the list would be printed all but
> simultaneously.

Well, as long as someone expects it to be that way, then I guess that'd
be OK.  I am concerned about an inconsistency with the serial tests that
go

test foo ... <pause>ok

whereas with the parallel tests don't give any indication what test has
started.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-01-18 23:25:03
Subject: Re: Review: Patch: Allow substring/replace() to get/set bit values
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2010-01-18 21:20:32
Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group