Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Kurt Harriman <harriman(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Date: 2010-01-18 21:20:32
Message-ID: 1263849632.24310.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On sön, 2009-12-06 at 02:21 -0800, Kurt Harriman wrote:
> > Which ones does it actually offer any benefit for?
>
> MSVC is one.

I seem to recall that somewhere else it was said that MSVC produces
warnings on unused static inline functions. Am I mistaken?

Also, if this is mainly for the benefit of MSVC, we don't really need a
configure check, do we?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2010-01-18 21:54:18 Re: parallel regression test output
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-01-18 21:01:44 Re: quoting psql varible as identifier