From:
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs
Date:
2009-12-28 16:14:04
Message-ID:
1262016844.10841.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2009-12-28 09:57:58 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2009-12-28 10:08:13 from Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-12-28 10:17:22 from Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2009-12-28 10:20:57 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2009-12-28 16:08:19 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-28 16:14:04 from Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
2009-12-28 16:20:19 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-28 18:29:01 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2009-12-28 20:18:08 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-29 07:50:49 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2009-12-29 13:35:52 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2009-12-29 15:24:38 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-01-12 14:23:19 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2010-02-01 20:42:02 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-02 09:03:21 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2010-02-07 05:01:08 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-07 17:46:18 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2010-02-08 04:17:53 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-08 10:53:34 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2010-02-11 18:52:12 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-12 15:48:32 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2010-02-12 17:34:21 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-12 18:22:06 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2010-02-12 18:38:11 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-12 18:55:36 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2010-02-12 20:06:16 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-14 03:15:26 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2010-02-14 03:30:24 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-16 20:58:23 from Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
2010-02-12 18:29:08 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2010-02-11 19:04:08 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-02-11 19:25:48 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-11 19:38:53 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-02-11 19:42:49 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-11 19:47:26 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2010-02-11 19:50:42 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-02-11 20:09:06 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2010-02-11 20:00:56 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2009-12-28 17:10:29 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-12-29 07:58:14 from Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
2009-12-29 08:06:21 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
On mån, 2009-12-28 at 11:08 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> > Hans-Juergen Schoenig írta:
> >> just as a background info: this will have some positive side effects
> >> on embedded C programs which should be portable.
>
> > Not just embedded C programs, every driver that's
> > based on libpq and used PQcmdTuples() will
> > automatically see the benefit.
>
> And, by the same token, the scope for possibly breaking clients is nearly
> unlimited ...
Why is that? Are there programs out there that expect PQcmdTuples() to
return something that is *not* the tuple count for these commands and
will violently misbehave otherwise?
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Simon RiggsDate: 2009-12-28 16:14:12Subject : Re: updateMinRecoveryPoint bug?Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2009-12-28 16:08:19Subject : Re: [PATCH] Provide rowcount for utility SELECTs
