Re: Dependency tracking tool

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Philippe Lang <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dependency tracking tool
Date: 2009-12-16 22:56:55
Message-ID: 1261004215.15029.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On mån, 2009-12-14 at 16:58 +0100, Philippe Lang wrote:
> My idea was to parse the functions definitions in order to build
> dependencies between the functions. I'm not sure how difficult it is,
> especially with overloaded functions, which require more than a simple
> pattern search inside the function definition in order to be
> distinguished...

In the general case, this will ultimately be equivalent to solving the
halting problem.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-12-16 23:05:52 Re: Justifying a PG over MySQL approach to a project
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-12-16 22:53:41 Re: getaddrinfo.c error