Re: Best way to index IP data?

From: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Best way to index IP data?
Date: 2008-01-11 22:38:27
Message-ID: 1259C7B1-C948-4326-B827-849C64B61A16@blighty.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Jan 11, 2008, at 2:24 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 05:02:36PM -0500, Michael Stone wrote:
>
>> networks), but there's a conspicuous lack of a type for (hosts). I
>> suppose if you really are sure that you want to store hosts and not
>> networks
>
> Well, part of the trouble is that in the CIDR world, an IP without a
> netmask
> can be dangerously ambiguous. I can see why the design is as it is
> for that
> reason. (But I understand the problem.)

I don't think there's ambiguity about what an dotted-quad without a
netmask
means, and hasn't been for a long time. Am I missing something?

There is ambiguity when you feed non dotted-quads into the
existing cidr I/O functions[1], but that's both a dead horse,
and not something likely to actually affect users negatively.

Cheers,
Steve

[1] Because postgresql copied obsolete pre-CIDR code from libbind.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pomarede Nicolas 2008-01-11 22:43:58 Re: Best way to index IP data?
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-01-11 22:24:03 Re: Best way to index IP data?