Re: Block-level CRC checks

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Date: 2009-12-04 13:00:13
Message-ID: 1259931613.13774.38311.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 09:52 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> BTW with VACUUM FULL removed I assume we're going to get rid of
> HEAP_MOVED_IN and HEAP_MOVED_OFF too, right?

Much as I would like to see those go, no. VF code should remain for some
time yet, IMHO. We could remove it, but doing so is not a priority
because it buys us nothing in terms of features and its the type of
thing we should do at the start of a release cycle, not end. I certainly
don't have time to do it, at least.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2009-12-04 13:06:17 Re: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-12-04 12:57:05 Re: Block-level CRC checks