Re: next CommitFest

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Subject: Re: next CommitFest
Date: 2009-11-13 22:05:00
Message-ID: 1258149900.14054.720.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 12:56 -0500, Greg Smith wrote:

> For now, simply telling submitters that the
> review of their own patches might be influenced by whether they do a
> good job reviewing someone else's has improved things considerably
> over past CommitFests, and it's hard to imagine how someone could
> complain about a guideline that fair.

OK, I guess if we're already doing it...

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2009-11-13 22:10:26 Re: next CommitFest
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-11-13 21:43:42 Re: Hot standby, overflowed snapshots, testing