Re: next CommitFest

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Subject: Re: next CommitFest
Date: 2009-11-13 21:07:24
Message-ID: 1258146444.14054.657.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Keep in mind that
> this is a problem that *does not apply to you*. You are a committer.
> If no one reviews your patch, you will eventually go ahead and commit
> it anyway. If no one reviews my patch, it doesn't go in.

That is the problem.

I understand that committers may not care, or agree. But blindness to a
problem doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Making anyone a committer doesn't change that problem, it just changes
*who* experiences the problem. But my view is that if *any* developer
experiences a problem then *we* the community experience a problem.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-11-13 21:09:06 Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-13 21:06:16 Re: [PATCH] dtrace probes for memory manager