Re: postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Cc: u235sentinel(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?
Date: 2009-10-19 06:35:07
Message-ID: 1255934107.1347.31.camel@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Chernow píše v ne 18. 10. 2009 v 21:09 -0400:
> > I'm curious if this is a lost hope. My boss is recommending we flatten
> > the Sun box and install redhat linux (which I'm fine with). I'd rather
> > not as threading in Solaris is better.
>
> Maybe solaris threads were better 10-15 years ago, but I'm not convinced that is
> still the case. Any data supporting that argument, solaris 10 threads vs. linux
> 2.6.11+ kernel (p)threads?

I can point on this article:

http://tweakers.net/reviews/649/all/database-test-sun-ultrasparc-t1-vs-punt-amd-opteron.html

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-10-19 07:01:50 Re: Reworks for Access Control facilities (r2363)
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2009-10-19 06:30:15 Re: postgres 8.3.8 and Solaris 10_x86 64 bit problems?