Re: Vote on Windows installer links

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vote on Windows installer links
Date: 2009-07-09 02:54:31
Message-ID: 1247108071.11347.303.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 16:41 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:

> The way this discussion has
> wandered into a non-technical popularity contest makes it really moot
> as far as I'm concerned.

This is a non-technical list. Originally, I was told that my view was
unpopular, so was not valid. After the motion seems popular you say it
is a popularity contest and again not valid. But what means is it
possible to raise a concern and establish the validity of that concern?

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2009-07-09 03:16:50 Re: New binary installer logo
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2009-07-09 02:48:13 Re: Vote on Windows installer links