| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
| Date: | 2009-05-13 21:04:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1242248646.3843.511.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 16:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > recovery_end_command is performed *after* the UpdateControlFile() once
> > the we are DB_IN_PRODUCTION.
>
> Hmm, shouldn't it be after the last checkpoint
Definitely.
> but before we go to DB_IN_PRODUCTION?
I think it can be either, so I'll go with your proposal.
(I'm aware Fujii-san is asleep right now, so we should expect another
viewpoint before tomorrow).
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-05-13 21:37:47 | Re: pg_views definition format |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-13 20:47:26 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |