| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
| Date: | 2009-05-13 19:08:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1242241732.3843.482.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 14:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Does this conclusion mean that changing pg_standby is no longer
> >> on the table for 8.4? It certainly smells more like a new feature
> >> than a bug fix.
>
> > This whole thing can be considered to be a new feature. It's working as
> > designed. But people seem to be surprised about the current behavior (me
> > included), and we don't currently provide the behavior that most people
> > actually want. I think we should fix it for 8.4.
>
> Well, that's okay by me if it can be done in a timely fashion. Bear in
> mind that we are planning to wrap beta2 not much more than 24 hours from
> now.
I'll write it now then, so it can be reviewed tomorrow.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-05-13 19:30:20 | Re: Implementation of GROUPING SETS (T431: Extended grouping capabilities) |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-05-13 19:05:52 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |