| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |
| Date: | 2009-05-12 10:48:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1242125339.3843.226.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 12:19 +0200, Dimitri wrote:
> For my big surprise, MySQL was faster!
Ours too.
** I bet you $1000 that I can improve the performance of your benchmark
results with PostgreSQL. You give me $1000 up-front and if I can't
improve your high end numbers I'll give you $2000 back. Either way, you
name me and link to me from your blog. Assuming you re-run the tests as
requested and give me reasonable access to info and measurements. **
I note your blog identifies you as a Sun employee. Is that correct? If
you do not give us the opportunity to improve upon the results then
reasonable observers might be persuaded you did not wish to show
PostgreSQL in its best light. You up for it?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri | 2009-05-12 11:16:08 | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |
| Previous Message | Dimitri | 2009-05-12 10:19:05 | Re: Any better plan for this query?.. |