Re: possible bug not in open items

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: possible bug not in open items
Date: 2009-03-27 21:19:04
Message-ID: 1238188744.5525.6.camel@dell.linuxdev.us.dell.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 15:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm not too familiar with this code, but I think we could just enable
> > ImmediateInterruptOK in CopyGetData().
>
> Only if you are wanting to break things.
>

Doesn't DoingCommandRead protect us in the SIGINT case?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan Barnhart 2009-03-27 21:37:15 BUG #4738: Cannot reconnect to shared memory
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-03-27 21:07:57 Re: possible bug not in open items