On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 12:02 -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Saturday 21 March 2009 09:04:12 Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > Robert Haas wrote:
> > My concern with the list of outstanding items for 8.4 based on a quick
> > look is that I think many of those things are not, in fact,
> > outstanding items for 8.4, and those that are may not be important
> > enough to hold up beta for. Now since I haven't read through them all
> > yet, I'm not 100% sure of that, but that's my concern for what it's
> > worth.
> Robert, this has been discussed many times before, and most people agree with
> you, but Bruce doesn't. I think the ony way this will change is if someone
> takes on the role of "release notes manager", subscrbes to pgsql-commits, and
> then starts updating a wiki page as each item is committed. Once other
> committers see that, I'm guessing they will start helping, and eventually
> Bruce will join in. Outside of that I think we're wasting our time on this.
This is actually a good point regardless of Bruce. The run down is this:
We have an individual that does stuff a certain way. That way works for
him. That individual is the one actually doing the work.
We have other individuals who would like to do it a different way.
I invite those individuals to do so. If there way proves to be more
efficient the community will move in that direction.
Joshua D. Drake
> Robert Treat
> Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
> Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2009-03-21 17:04:23|
|Subject: Re: win32 open item|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-03-21 16:27:27|
|Subject: Re: contrib function naming, and upgrade issues |