Re: idle users

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Sathish Duraiswamy <sathish(at)leatherlink(dot)net>
Cc: Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, paulo matadr <saddoness(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>, GENERAL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: idle users
Date: 2009-03-05 19:51:42
Message-ID: 1236282702.6979.66.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 01:09 +0530, Sathish Duraiswamy wrote:
> Can we automate this process , maintained by postmaster itself

No and that would be a bad idea. There has been discussion in the past
of having an IDLE in TRANSACTION timeout but that is a different thing.

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2009-03-05 20:16:42 Re: converting older databases
Previous Message Sathish Duraiswamy 2009-03-05 19:39:27 Re: idle users