| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "K, Niranjan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)" <niranjan(dot)k(at)nsn(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
| Date: | 2009-02-25 21:24:19 |
| Message-ID: | 1235597059.16176.354.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 06:15 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > That is exactly what I am against. Note the words "get rid of".
> >
> > This prevents parallel data transfer, use of split mirrors and various
> > other techniques. It sounds neater, but it implies removal of useful
> > features.
>
> OK, ISTM that my description was confusing you, so I removed that statement
> from the TODO item on wiki.
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NTT%27s_Development_Projects#Todo_and_Claim
>
> Again, I'm not planning to get rid of any existing capabilities
Good
> unless necessary.
That is not a caveat I will accept, a priori.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-02-25 21:26:01 | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2009-02-25 21:15:50 | Re: Synchronous replication & Hot standby patches |