From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning |
Date: | 2009-01-27 19:52:36 |
Message-ID: | 1233085956.2327.2273.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 14:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Right, which is why it's bad for something like a foreign key constraint
> >> to expose the fact that the row does exist after all.
>
> > Once again, this is not an issue for us.
>
> Yes it is an issue
> The question of whether there is a covert channel is only a small part
> of my complaint here. If it's the judgement of security experts that
> that's an acceptable thing, that's fine, it's their turf. But SQL
> behavior is my turf, and I'm not happy with discarding fundamental
> semantic properties.
Why did we bother to invite Joshua here if we aren't going to listen to
him?
Thanks for coming to help Joshua, much appreciated.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2009-01-27 19:55:54 | Re: 8.4 release planning |
Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2009-01-27 19:51:02 | Re: 8.4 release planning |