Re: pg_upgrade project status

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade project status
Date: 2009-01-27 16:04:22
Message-ID: 1233072262.16147.19.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 10:56 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>

>
> That's what my brief examination of the script was about - looking to
> see if it could be translated portably. I think it very probably can. I
> suspect it won't need any modules at all. I suspect any

Accidental ctrl-enter?

O.k. well you certainly know more about perl than I do. If you are
comfortable with the portability, I have no complaints (except that I am
not willing to wait for it to be done for 8.4).

Joshua D. Drake

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdrake(at)jabber(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-27 16:07:35 Re: pgsql: Silence compiler warning on win32.
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-01-27 16:03:10 Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)