From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Review: B-Tree emulation for GIN |
Date: | 2009-01-19 16:58:43 |
Message-ID: | 1232384323.7281.116.camel@jdavis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 11:35 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> > I like the fact that this patch does not modify the numeric ADT. It
> > still relies on the fact that the numeric type will never make use of
> > the minimal varlena struct, however. I bring this up in case someone
> > sees it as a problem.
>
> I'm pretty certain I recall Greg Stark recommending that we adopt
> something like that as the standard numeric representation of zero.
> It didn't get done yet, but it might happen someday.
>
Then we should use the previous version of the patch here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1231709713.25019.129.camel@jdavis
Was there any talk of supporting a +/- infinity in numeric? If we did
that, it would allow numeric to be supported for btree-gin.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-01-19 17:13:18 | Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements |
Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2009-01-19 16:57:46 | Re: number of connections |