Re: [CORE] archiving binary releases

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [CORE] archiving binary releases
Date: 2009-01-10 17:43:37
Message-ID: 1231609418.10604.10.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 12:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

> > To access the files within pg_data you need the binaries of that
> > version.
>
> That's nonsense. The last release in the series will do fine, and
> forcing an update to the last point release wouldn't be a bad thing
> anyway ;-).

+1

>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harald Armin Massa 2009-01-10 19:29:45 Re: [CORE] archiving binary releases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-10 17:41:42 Re: [CORE] archiving binary releases