From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] archiving binary releases |
Date: | 2009-01-10 17:43:37 |
Message-ID: | 1231609418.10604.10.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 12:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > To access the files within pg_data you need the binaries of that
> > version.
>
> That's nonsense. The last release in the series will do fine, and
> forcing an update to the last point release wouldn't be a bad thing
> anyway ;-).
+1
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Harald Armin Massa | 2009-01-10 19:29:45 | Re: [CORE] archiving binary releases |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-10 17:41:42 | Re: [CORE] archiving binary releases |