| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | "Rutherdale, Will" <Rutherw(at)cisco(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Data Replication |
| Date: | 2008-12-12 17:49:01 |
| Message-ID: | 1229104141.7198.67.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 18:45 +0100, Markus Wanner wrote:
> Hello Joshua,
> Well, yeah, maybe Postgres-R is going to loose that sale as well. But
> hey, it's not long ago since you've open sourced it. What makes you
> think that you've already "lost that sale"? I for example didn't find
> time to look at the Replicator sources up until now.
>
> However, IMO there's more to a fork than just having different source
> trees. When I hear of a fork, I think of something more like SQL-Ledger
> vs. LedgerSMB, where major disagreements play a role. Everything else is
> just ordinary evolution of software ;-)
>
Heh fair enough.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rusty Conover | 2008-12-12 17:56:09 | Re: Question with combining ANY with ilike |
| Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2008-12-12 17:45:42 | Re: Data Replication |