| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication: reading recovery.conf |
| Date: | 2008-12-08 14:39:02 |
| Message-ID: | 1228747142.20796.661.camel@hp_dx2400_1 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 12:01 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I haven't testsed, but it looks to me that the recovery.conf reading
> patch doesn't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode (= Windows). You'll need to add
> recoveryRestoreCommand to save/read_backend_parameters in postmaster.c.
That comment has also already been made on the existing review thread.
We're discussing some architectural aspects, so it would be a good if
you were there also. It's important we all agree on those things.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-12-08 14:39:59 | Re: Multiplexing SUGUSR1 |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-12-08 14:36:37 | Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables |