| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Index use during Hot Standby |
| Date: | 2008-10-21 10:50:29 |
| Message-ID: | 1224586229.3808.924.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:11 +0400, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > I guess we'd use the same technique for GIN. ginInsertValue() ??
> > Hmm, you release the lock at line 412, ginbtree.c before you get the
> > parent lock at line 428. That seems different to the L&Y interactions.
> > Am I looking in the wrong place?
>
> at line 412 new page (right page) is unlocked, old page (left one) is unlocked
> later - at line 448, after parent page is locked.
Thanks for checking.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-10-21 10:55:32 | Re: SSL cleanups/hostname verification |
| Previous Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2008-10-21 10:24:00 | Re: SE-PostgreSQL wiki updates, but ... |